Suffering For Christian Liberty

If you end up deciding you just can’t attend your cousin’s same-sex wedding (and being criticized for it), it might help you to know you aren’t alone.  (Or, perhaps, you will be criticized by your Christian friends because you attend the wedding–even though your decision is made with a clear conscience that it is the right thing to do.) Or perhaps criticism comes because you have put your children in public schools under Core Curriculum standards.   Many Christians have suffered for their freedom to act in “things indifferent.” ( I am not saying that the wedding is an indifferent matter, but your decision to attend is a personal choice.)

What Are Matters of Conscience?

Our conscience tells us what is right or wrong.  But because we are sinners, it is not always right.  “Let your conscience be your guide” will sometimes fail you, especially if you have failed to use the Bible as your standard to determine right from wrong.  In this case of our “burning issue,” you might have false guilt if you decide to attend the wedding when family or church leaders oppose you.  Sometimes our consciences condemn us without any scriptural reason.

Martin Luther and John Calvin were both champions for liberty of conscience in the 1500’s.  Their fight for liberty was not about “things indifferent” (issues to which the Bible does not speak directly) or even secondary issues where the Bible is unclear but about the main themes of the Bible.  The Catholic Church had abused its own standards for years by telling people what they could and could not do or believe about indifferent areas as well as biblical doctrine.  After “discovering” justification by faith, Luther was repeatedly asked by agents of the Pope to recant.  The gospel was not a matter on which the Bible was silent but even here Luther’s response was that he could do nothing against his conscience.  On June 15, 1520, he was excommunicated and all his writings were ordered burned.  Even though the matter was neither indifferent or secondary but, rather, the main theme of the Bible, he suffered because to recant would be against what he had concluded was the right thing to believe.  More than 300 men and women were burned between 1547-1553 in England and Scotland for their acceptance of Luther and Calvin’s teaching, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Cranmer.  This was suffering for the truth, for Reformation, but not for indifferent matters.  That was to come later.  Acting with a clear conscience was still a part of it.

Imagine being burned at the stake for translating the New Testament into English!  Or for not supporting private masses for the dead.  William Tyndale (1536) and Anne Askew were killed during the reign of the English King Henry VIII.  Later, the placing of Fox’s Book of Martyrs and the English Bible in each parish church led to the Reformation in England and Scotland.  At last, average people could read the Bible for themselves and they concluded justification by faith was the true gospel.  These were not matters of indifference or even secondary issues, such as church government or baptism, to which biblical principles can be applied yet remain debatable.   The Bible is not silent on the gospel!  Do you have a right attitude toward the opinions of others in indifferent or secondary issues?  The lessons of history are pretty clear.  Involving the government in matters of faith is a big mistake!  Splitting families or churches over indifferent or secondary issues is disruptive and does harm to the gospel.

England forgot some of these lessons.  By the 1660’s, laws were passed requiring the Anglican Book of Common Prayer to be used as the only source of doctrine and worship (instead of the Bible).  About 2000 pastors were ejected from their pulpits because they refused to go along with that. Many other laws followed as restrictions and punishments.  You could not attend Oxford or Cambridge or the private schools preparing you for higher education.  You could not vote or hold public office. You could not preach or pastor without official approval.  It was not until 1689 that these punishments were lifted.  (If you want to see how this affected a life, read “Matthew Henry,” in my book on Warm-hearted Calvinists” posted on this site.) 

The “burning issue” in those days was whether your conscience would allow you to accept the government telling you what you had to believe about God and how you would worship Him.  This was a classic example of passing judgment on people who were within their rights to differ with the majority opinion on secondary and indifferent matters.  God used this suffering to lay the foundations for the revivals that came to England, Scotland, and America in the 1700’s.  (See S.M. Houghton, Sketches From Church History, (http://www.banneroftruth.org).  This suffering was known in America and so the First Amendment to the Constitution sought to free individuals from such abuse by the government.

It is as a consequence of these historical events that the Westminster Confession and the Baptist Confession of 1689 (and the New Hampshire Confession in America) included a chapter on Christian Liberty,

God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men, which are in any thing contrary to His Word; or beside it, in matters of faith or worship.  So that, to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commands, out of conscience, is to betray true liberty of conscience:  and the requiring of an implicit faith, and an absolute blind obedience is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also. (italics, mine. Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 20:2)

WHAT DOES ALL THIS HISTORY HAVE TO DO WITH ME?

Perhaps you will have an experience like mine.  I was once in a church where the pastor’s wife had a controlling personality.  It was her way or the highway.  When I would not go along with her edict to attend her Bible classes, she told others that I was obviously not a Christian.  So the other women drew back from me.  I wasted a lot of time wondering if I’d really become a Christian as a child and feeling isolated.  I didn’t know it at the time, but I was suffering for Christian liberty.  My judgment was that it was just not in the best interest of my children for me to attend those long morning Bible studies where there were no activities planned for them.  I preferred for them to play at the park or in the pool.  It was an indifferent matter; the Bible gave no clear commands either way.  My conscience just would not let me impose a long, boring, indoor morning on my girls.  But, I suffered a lot until I met Pastor Ernest Reisinger who gave me a copy of these Confessions of Faith and took time out of a very busy schedule to explain Christian liberty to me.  A friend of mine loved the song, “In the Garden” by C. Austin Miles.  It is an allegorical song picturing a personal relationship with Jesus.  But, her church leaders did not like it because it was low on doctrine.  So, in a high-handed use of their authority, they offended her greatly by telling her how awful the song was and she should not sing it or teach it to her children.  She liked the song.  She did not like being told what she could sing in her home.  It was an abuse of her liberty in an indifferent matter.

What Does This History Have To Do With My Children?

They need to know some of the broad sweeps of Christian history.  If the experiences of the 1500’s had been remembered, then the 16 and 1700’s would have been very different.  Surely we won’t make the same mistakes again!  Why not order Sketches From Church History, by S.M. Houghton at (http://www.banneroftruth.org) for your home library.  It is the best easy reading history of the Christian church I’ve used.

You or your children may have to suffer a little one day for something  you or they decide is right to do or say.  But, understanding Christian liberty will be a comfort during those days.  Think about the Bible’s teaching:

Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another?  It is before his own master that he stands or falls.  And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand….Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind….Why do you pass judgment on your brother?  Or you, why do you despise your brother?  For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God;…So then each of us will give an account of himself to God (Romans 14:4-12).

 

 

About Carol Brandt

I earned a B.A. in History from Florida State University and M.Ed in.Higher Education from Florida Atlantic University. I taught high school social studies before “retiring” to full-time homemaking and raising two daughters. Now I love being a grandmother to four boys and a girl. I have also raised five collies.

My husband, John, was an optometrist, who worked tirelessly for his profession through private practice and as a consultant, and served on the Board of Trustees of Illinois College of Optometry for twenty years.

Ernest Reisinger was my chief mentor in this warm-hearted application of Calvinism. He gave me many books! The Founders Journal and Founders Conferences, Martyn Lloyd-Jones, and Charles Spurgeon have been other sources of Reformed thinking as well as the other warm-hearted ones listed in my book, “Warm-hearted Calvinists.”

Comments are closed